From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grzegorz Milos Subject: Re: mini-os (not a cross post) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:04:00 +0100 Message-ID: <433D0D90.3060203@cam.ac.uk> References: <43387E02.2020607@cs.unm.edu> <20050928182439.GA15278@castle.3leafnetworks.com> <433AFBCE.4010406@cs.unm.edu> <20050928204004.GA17749@castle.3leafnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050928204004.GA17749@castle.3leafnetworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi there guys! I am currently responsible for mini-os. I've recently updated the code to make it work under 32 bit (mini-os was not used for quite some time, almost 2 years if I am correct. Subsequently the changes in the interfaces broke it). I've started fixing 64-bit version as well, but now I am busy with something else. It will therefore have to wait a little unless you are interested in helping out. I could give you precise list of things than need fixing is such case. Cheers Gregor Dave Olien wrote: > Yes, on x86_64. One possibility is that the > mini-os I built was from the recent unstable source, but my dom0 kernel > and hypervisor were built from older sources. There is probably an > incompatbility there. I'll try again using consistent versions when I get > the time. > > Let me know what you find. > > Dave > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:23:42PM -0600, Donour Sizemore wrote: > >>Were your you trying to boot it on a 64bit machine? >> >>donour > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel