From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Subject: Re: Different size of partion between reiser4 and reiserFS 3.6 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:41:24 +0400 Message-ID: <433D3274.7050305@namesys.com> References: <200509301233.20008.xxlucas@seznam.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200509301233.20008.xxlucas@seznam.cz> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: luc Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello luc wrote: > Hi, > > i want to try use reiser4 and i discover this : > > I have 80Gb Western Digital HDD. When i created one partition (full > disk) > > mkfs.reiserfs -f /dev/sda1 > > then obtain this > > reiserfs 3.6 > [root@Merlin luc]# df -k > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda1 78145768 32840 78112928 1% /mnt/te > ^^^^^^^ > when i did > > mkfs.reiser4 -f /dev/sda1 > > reiser4 > [root@Merlin luc]# df -k > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda1 74256016 2544 74253472 1% /mnt/te > ^^^^^^^ reiser4 subtracted amount of reserved space. Probably it should have not done that. > > > I use patch from ftp.namesys.com for kernel 2.6.12 and > libreiser4progs-1.0_4-1.0.4-1mdk , reiser4progs-1.0.4-1mdk. Is here > anyone who is able to explain me why the size of partion sda1 is > different ???