From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radoslaw Szkodzinski Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc2+ - problem with DHCP Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <433F0228.6000304@gorzow.mm.pl> References: <433EBBEC.4050203@gorzow.mm.pl> <433ECE42.2070400@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <433ECE42.2070400@trash.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrick McHardy wrote: | | Are you sure? The patch was supposed to fix problems with DHCP clients | using regular UDP sockets for sending DHCP requests. Which client are | you using? | udhcpcd, version 0.9.9-pre (Gentoo ebuild net-misc/udhcp-0.9.9_pre20041216-r1, no crazy optimisations, stock init script, IP release disabled) 2.6.13, 2.6.14-rc1 (up to the patch) both work fine. 2.6.14-rc2 and 2.6.14-rc3 do not. (they can't discover IP address) The window is between that commit and rc2. (about 180 changesets) I only suspect that patch, it could be something else but I highly doubt it. I'll check the current kernel with the patch backed out when I have to restart. - -- GPG Key id: 0xD1F10BA2 Fingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0 9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2 AstralStorm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDPwIolUMEU9HxC6IRAit8AJ0TXQv+BO3rn0L39JsCad7UqyUMRACeIf+U cvzDCU1x9oTP2V4AjELJUvY= =hp5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----