From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Donour Sizemore Subject: Re: mini-os (not a cross post) Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:02:21 -0600 Message-ID: <4341803D.7090402@cs.unm.edu> References: <43387E02.2020607@cs.unm.edu> <20050928182439.GA15278@castle.3leafnetworks.com> <433AFBCE.4010406@cs.unm.edu> <20050928204004.GA17749@castle.3leafnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050928204004.GA17749@castle.3leafnetworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dave Olien Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Dave Olien wrote: >Yes, on x86_64. One possibility is that the >mini-os I built was from the recent unstable source, but my dom0 kernel >and hypervisor were built from older sources. There is probably an >incompatbility there. I'll try again using consistent versions when I get >the time. > > I tried this with recent unstable-source, but ran into quite a few other errors. Specifically, this one has me perplexed: /usr/include/linux/types.h:34: error: conflicting types for `size_t' I didn't think that could happen has the x86 and x86_64 hypercall.h are the same (at least in the linux-2.6-sparse directory). Did you make any progress since the booting errors? donour