From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43445F51.7090403@colitti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005230045.GA22906@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> "Cool, so you have done 100% of work and now it is stable, fast and
> tested. You only need to do 200% more work to get it merged".
>
> Merging into kernel is not easy, sorry.
Of course. I was just saying that it might be better for users if you,
Nigel and the other parties involved collaborated on getting suspend2
merged instead of working on 2 or 3 separate implementations. My gut
feeling is that it would be quicker to do that than to nail the sucky
low-level bugs that are bound to come up when developing the new uswsusp
framework.
And now, since there's nothing I can actually do to help this - you
can't learn to be a kernel hacker in two weeks - I'll shut up. But I
just wanted to remind everyone involved that from a user's perspective,
it would be great if suspend2 were merged.
It works, it's fast, it's stable, and it does what users want. That's a
strong combination. It would be really good if you could work together
to merge it.
Cheers,
Lorenzo
--
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-02 23:13 [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file Pavel Machek
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-03 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 15:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-04 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 22:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05 8:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 21:21 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 22:54 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:18 ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2005-10-06 10:10 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-06 8:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-09 23:41 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-04 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05 0:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 8:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06 8:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-06 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43445F51.7090403@colitti.com \
--to=lorenzo@colitti.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.