From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932160AbVJGAbF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:31:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932222AbVJGAbF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:31:05 -0400 Received: from [64.162.99.240] ([64.162.99.240]:45602 "EHLO spamtest2.viacore.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932160AbVJGAbD (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:31:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4345C148.9030606@spamtest.viacore.net> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:28:56 -0700 From: Joe Bob Spamtest User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Fedora/1.7.12-1.5.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Perkel CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why is this list using Majordomo? References: <4343FEDF.3020002@perkel.com> In-Reply-To: <4343FEDF.3020002@perkel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marc Perkel wrote: > Instead of a smarter more modern list software package like Mailman? Am I the only one that smells troll?