From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:49:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4346357.L5KG7J6tvv@xps13>
References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <20170217160731.GA30539@char.us.ORACLE.com> <58AB0C46.5020601@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
 Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, "Tan,
 Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
 dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com,
 Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57C4591E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:49:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id r141so5337847wmg.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:49:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <58AB0C46.5020601@oracle.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins:
> On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> >> Le 16/02/2017 =E0 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a =E9crit :
> >>>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
> >>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is wa=
iting
> >>> for review of xen-devel to the spec.
> >>>
> >>> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0
> >>> parts of code in DPDK.
> >>
> >> Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interestin=
g to share
> >> it with DPDK community too.
> >=20
> > Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I =
know
> > they are no in the right state with the review of the staging
> > grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get
> > a feel for what DPDK APIs you used?
> OK, see attached - I should note that its a WIP as Konrad noted, but =
once the
> staging grants work is finished, the code would be improved to have i=
t in better
> shape (as well as in feature parity) for a proper RFC [and adhering t=
o the
> project coding style].

Excuse my ignorance on Xen.
Is xen-netback for Dom0?
Is the DPDK Dom0 support working and useful?