Re: [ SEMANAGE ] [ SEPOL ] More database work

[Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@cornell.edu>]

> (and yes, the interfaces can still change;
> this is just a snapshot).
>   
I think this is important, in particular with respect to my functions - 
I may still change those. I haven't decided if the key structure should 
play a role in sepol. Some of the user functions may not be needed.
> I didn't do anything about handles yet.  Note that the interfaces vary
> quite a bit in what they take, with some taking sepol_policydb's, others
> taking sepol_policy_file's, and others taking sepol_module_package's,
> and some taking a combination.  Plus Ivan's interfaces, some of which
> take sepol_policydb's but others just taking his new record structures.
> So it seems like a handle would have to be separated if it is going to
> be universal to all of the interfaces.
>   
Hmm, that's true... we should separate the handle.
Are there any other uses for a handle, besides debugging settings?



--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.