From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dinolinux Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:09:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] arch/i386/kernel/doublefault.c Message-Id: <43480D56.408@tele2.no> List-Id: References: <20051003110453.GA10630@rhum.iomeda.fr> In-Reply-To: <20051003110453.GA10630@rhum.iomeda.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 04:54:41PM +0000, slackfan@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > >>--- linux-2.6.14-rc2.orig/arch/i386/kernel/doublefault.c >>+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2/arch/i386/kernel/doublefault.c >> >> > > > >>- printk("double fault, gdt at %08lx [%d bytes]\n", gdt, gdt_desc.size); >>+ printk(KERN_ALERT "double fault, gdt at %08lx [%d bytes]\n", gdt, gdt_desc.size); >> >> if (ptr_ok(gdt)) { >> gdt += GDT_ENTRY_TSS << 3; >> tss = *(u16 *)(gdt+2); >> tss += *(u8 *)(gdt+4) << 16; >> tss += *(u8 *)(gdt+7) << 24; >>- printk("double fault, tss at %08lx\n", tss); >>+ printk(KERN_CRIT "double fault, tss at %08lx\n", tss); >> >> > >Different priorities? > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Kernel-janitors mailing list >Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org >https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors > > Will it be better if I put KERN_CRIT on all printk lines? _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors