From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakob Hirsch Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:08:16 +0000 Subject: Re: Fw: footer isn't appended to multipart messages (part II: reality Message-Id: <434AE650.7000504@plonk.de> List-Id: References: <200507052130.02825.lists@seattleserver.com> In-Reply-To: <200507052130.02825.lists@seattleserver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Neale Pickett wrote: >>There's no real downside in always having a MIME mail, or is it? > I would consider this behaviour undesirable. YMMV. I don't want to raise another "MIME - bad or not?" discussion, but why? MIME was considered a bad back in the old days, when bandwidth was expensive and many MUAs couldn't handle it. Things have changed a lot since then. > If this does get added I hope it's optional. So there should be an option footer_never_mime? Don't think that makes much sense. If the mail has a multipart content-type, the footer will be lost. If it's already MIME, we only meet the standards.