From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bernard?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix iptables on systems with discontiguous processor ids Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:59:20 +0200 Message-ID: <434C27A8.5080403@frankengul.org> References: <20051010164141.GG5627@rama> <434AE1A0.5030400@frankengul.org> <20051011142347.GB4756@rama.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20051011142347.GB4756@rama.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte a =E9crit : >On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:48:16PM +0200, S=E9bastien Bernard wrote: > =20 > >>>[snip] >>> =20 >>> >>I tested this patch on my machine. >>It ooops instantly in get_counters() from ip_tables.c. >> =20 >> > >Mh, can you capture the oops and send it? I'm travelling and don't have >access to any SMP box, so it's unlikely I will be able to resolve this >alone. > =20 > What information do you need exactly ? The oops can be tiresome to write down. Is the stackdump enough or do you need register info ? Seb