From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> References: <4194408.X82ccDjh5X@wuerfel> <5213510.IMdSbsXdoQ@wuerfel> <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote: > > Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like > a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the > equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd > need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply > have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the > vendor option first. Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more in line with the other drivers. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> References: <4194408.X82ccDjh5X@wuerfel> <5213510.IMdSbsXdoQ@wuerfel> <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0A36E46E for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 00:39:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org T24gTW9uZGF5IDA0IEphbnVhcnkgMjAxNiAwOToyNDoxNiBUaGllcnJ5IFJlZGluZyB3cm90ZToK PiAKPiBVZ2guLi4gd291bGRuJ3QgaXQgYmUgbXVjaCBzaW1wbGVyIHRvIGdldCByaWQgb2YgRFJN X0FSTT8gSXQgc2VlbXMgbGlrZQo+IGEgY29tcGxldGVseSBzdXBlcmZsdW91cyBvcHRpb24gdG8g bWUuIEkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgd2UndmUgZXZlciBoYWQgdGhlCj4gZXF1aXZhbGVudCBvZiAidmVu ZG9yIiBLY29uZmlnIG9wdGlvbnMgaW4gRFJNLCBhbmQgSSBkb24ndCBzZWUgd2h5IHdlJ2QKPiBu ZWVkIHRvIHN0YXJ0IG5vdy4gSWYgQVJNIHdhcyBnb2luZyB0byBhZGQgYW5vdGhlciBkcml2ZXIg aXQgY2FuIHNpbXBseQo+IGhhdmUgYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBLY29uZmlnIGVudHJ5LiBUaGVyZSBzaG91 bGQgYmUgbm8gbmVlZCB0byBzZWxlY3QgdGhlCj4gdmVuZG9yIG9wdGlvbiBmaXJzdC4KCkZpbmUg d2l0aCBtZSB0b28uIEkgdmFndWVseSByZW1lbWJlcmVkIGhhdmluZyBzZWVuIHNvbWUgZGlzY3Vz c2lvbiBhYm91dAp0aGlzLCBzbyBJIGRlY2lkZWQgdG8gZG8gYSBtaW5pbWFsIGZpeCwgYnV0IEkg YWdyZWUgdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBtb3JlCmluIGxpbmUgd2l0aCB0aGUgb3RoZXIgZHJpdmVycy4K CglBcm5kCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmRy aS1kZXZlbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKZHJpLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZwpodHRw Oi8vbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753190AbcADIk1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 03:40:27 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:54206 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753149AbcADIkX (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 03:40:23 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Thierry Reding , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> References: <4194408.X82ccDjh5X@wuerfel> <5213510.IMdSbsXdoQ@wuerfel> <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kJZGJRsD2UMqM/BJojDpPisZtydgH6b30VaHXDY+aTQSXRLFheM upqoYAZv88vjFs19948h+jkjvZP/hKMK67LxDM83ZBK17C2yV1KcxiPwF5K0YSQbDvpedtb Utmcjd1E9jKbdwQW4ksfznYOk6UtMJIwCB/68LEoVHu5NPNMt2qigGcQnrgZ70qaxdRkczs ceIC893kubB9Nw1D0+emQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:a6wssi2XVWc=:4wux5cU66Gm9WtJJKsAjtT H9BknIwXRW9GDYMnuynwHpuWfcF9o7jQ2a8kQSwZZr9cVStW+9oQLIcC1JZGr4vfwLCdmnDfW 2AAMu/mNdv/myvXbXhWmiH9tOpDu/xVDOzTk5dbf4QhhrfxAkj18Nyqrr+FMDdYRUUCGm3FKS KA2huVeleHeZWhcVoi2otx3NJopqRr2bUbVAg/qrszXAEJq5vE2Hr8kfES7spqOC6NGj3aQyz vzGXQ4BLXPl2uTOgh9c8bbivFGLVtyr3RJidth9+K4cGKteQvGZ7HrzU3afcZwwPJFo3GxiBf 7y5ozokIM33i5wAf4vtCsp1olWC0XdhgsfSlNtp15ocHz6QbAgSuDNnlnXXCZwPZEnFKjPo3F /TJttHaltxDtTvDFUB91+el3TVWfs+c4K40nxj2u75hdnWtPjIW0kq1ShoXrM/TVpjXUOioEi O4cEp6ELTYa8iNtzge1KJLYrzj3XHEXfJbRYhi1WRkqxZkYag3W4OWHX78/7vIuMT6fwNpo+z +vd80a2cGkDaql6IP790OErv2SchuSKIYpin8UvC0JAZoQdTHE0ouY+I4iETcrhCwP2HdAxTq G68vFlYx8K6N8qiPfm65wGYvc0RPc0Xi4CNjOo1xDBt3FNOU8eP6noSyZ+KQhsfnmN8Dc8LnP AHSh37O4vx1fMhXT8IHN83DWWXB0Gb7zMG+gR6xxkN+ZjZUkY5yidkfieujHn+Cu90UaIFil2 sRUPDSVDkyZ0Xs5n Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote: > > Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like > a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the > equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd > need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply > have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the > vendor option first. Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more in line with the other drivers. Arnd