From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gypsy Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:40:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] esfq ? or wrr ? Message-Id: <43512305.6E60C5FC@iswest.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Corey Hickey wrote: > > I still maintain ESFQ; the latest version is at: > http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ > > This would be an appropriate time to ask: > Does anybody have any fixes for or improvements to ESFQ that I don't > know about? My patch doesn't have anything revolutionary -- I've been > merely keeping Alexander Clouter's 2.6 port in sync with the upstream > changes to SFQ. > > -Corey 1) I'd like for your code to support kernel version 2.4! It is crazy that there are two branches of ESFQ. 2) ESFQ should be able to match a firewall mark, dport and sport. All except CLASSIC should understand NOT ("! sport 22"). 3) The documentation should be improved. -- gypsy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc