From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <435155D1.5090302@domain.hid>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:17:37 +0300
From: Heikki Lindholm <holindho@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Testing the adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-00.patch
References: <43514FE1.80703@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <43514FE1.80703@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
> Hello Philippe,
> 
> I got Xenomai working on a Ocotea-Board (AMCC 440GX) and a low-end
> TQM855L-Module (MPC 855) under Linux 2.6.14-rc3 :-). The patch applied
> with a few hunks and one easy to fix reject and I had to correct two
> problems. One with FEW_CONTEXT (see attached patch) and the second with
> "#include <asm/offsets.h>" in "xenomai/arch/ppc/hal/switch.S". The
> include file does not exist (any more) in the kernel tree and therefore
> I commented out the line. I'm going to perform latency tests on various
> 4xx and 8xx boards next week. Here are some preliminary figures of the
> TQM855L-Module (CPU 80 MHz, Bus 40 MHz, 4 kB I-Cache 4 kB D-Cache):

If you happen to know some (semi-)comparable figures for the same boards 
using some commercial RTOS, it would be nice to know them also, for 
comparison.

-- Heikki Lindholm