From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETFILTER: add support for invert condition (!) in ipt_limit Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4353C6BD.20500@trash.net> References: <20051017094417.GA26911@pc-innocenti.cineca.it> <20051017.184547.117007327.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20051017143053.GA29010@pc-innocenti.cineca.it> <4353BFFB.7070406@trash.net> <20051017152815.GA23954@linuxace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Marco Innocenti Return-path: To: Phil Oester In-Reply-To: <20051017152815.GA23954@linuxace.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Phil Oester wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:15:07PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Probably, I've never liked these strange looking expressions. > > Multiport invert works fine (I added/tested it). No sense in > changing it just based on looks. Yes, this wouldn't be a fix but a cleanup patch. But actually it looks fine, I think it was some ip6_tables matches that had these weird looking expressions - although they also seem to be cleaned up already.