From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: stoeni <xen@stoeni.de>
Subject: Re: PAE on xen-2.0 testing?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:26:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4353ECC6.4060200@stoeni.de>
References: <4353EA9A.90307@stoeni.de>
	<200510171921.30312.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510171921.30312.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Mark Williamson schrieb:
> I'm afraid if you want PAE you'll want unstable/3.0 - it'll probably never be 
> backported to 2.0.  Xen-unstable is relatively stable now though, so you 
> might want to try it out for evaluation purposes since it will become 3.0 
> eventually.

ok, good to know. the 3.0 thing doesn't really work, after mailing
hundreds :) of mails with keir yesterday the source from today broke the
system again. gdth causes a panic .. if it compiles some vif are coming
up, some not. same show as on saturday/sunday :(

i'll wait the next days for an upcoming source that will work on this
maschine ;-)

-- 
Tschaw/2,
Stoeni!

++ Please remember: rm -rf means "read mail -really fast" ++