From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] The effects of queueing on delay...(TX Ring Buffer the
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:20:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4353F98B.8020709@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1129064647.13493.41.camel@pgala.it.nuigalway.ie>
Jonathan Lynch wrote:
> This was down to the tx buffer size on the network card i was using. It
> was an Intel 82547EI gigabit Card using the e1000 driver and operating
> at 100mbit. The tx buffer was set to 256 which caused this huge delay.
> The minimum the driver lets me reduce the tx buffer size using ethtool
> is 80. By reducing the tx ring buffer to 80, the delay when there is
> full link utilisation and a maximum queue of 10 packets was reduced from
> 30ms to 10ms.
>
> The 3com 3c59x vortex driver uses a tx buffer of 16. I reduced the tx to
> 16 on the e1000 driver, but the max throughput i could achieve on the
> interface went down.
>
> Has anyone experimented with reducing the size of the tx buffer on this
> card to get a good balance between delay and throughput ?
Strange - I thought that as long as you are under rate for the link then
the most htb should burst per tick is the burst size specified.
That assumes one bulk class - more will make it worse.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-11 21:04 [LARTC] The effects of queueing on delay Jonathan Lynch
2005-10-13 16:06 ` [LARTC] The effects of queueing on delay...(TX Ring Buffer the Jonathan Lynch
2005-10-17 19:20 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2005-11-19 23:53 ` Jonathan Lynch
2005-12-06 1:55 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4353F98B.8020709@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.