From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nivedita Singhvi Subject: Re: peth1: received packet with own address as source address Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:36:38 -0700 Message-ID: <43544396.7030203@us.ibm.com> References: <1129574685.6253.20.camel@dbarrera_tp> <4353F277.3080703@yahoo.de> <1129580110.6252.28.camel@dbarrera_tp> <435409BE.1070006@yahoo.de> <435411F0.6030401@us.ibm.com> <1129586052.4362.3.camel@thinkpad> <1129589544.3496.211.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com> <1129591865.3496.224.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1129591865.3496.224.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ted Kaczmarek Cc: Arnd Schmitter , Jerone Young , xen-devel , Andrew Theurer , David F Barrera List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ted Kaczmarek wrote: >>It happens consistently. >> >>The no arp issue may be masking something else, you really want the >>bridge to respond for arps for nodes behind it, otherwise all ports must >>get flooded. >> >> > > My bad, mixing up arp snooping here, the arps must always be flooded. > Been mulling this, peth0 is the bridge id, but without spanning tree > running should not be doing anything. Ian also stated this when I first > brought this up. Er, peth0 is the physical interface - not sure what you mean by "is the bridge id", Ted? > Has anyone captured this packet/frame yet? Timezone delay ;). Tmrw morning.. > That would likely explain a lot. Yep. I'll try and repro tonight if possible, or just catch one of the guys on irc who are seeing it if they're around.. thanks, Nivedita