From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid?
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:35:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435578C7.1090504@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4350A1C5.3080902@shaw.ca>
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Lajber Zoltan wrote:
>
>> We have about 7 serverraid card from 4L to 5i. All of them is sitting on
>> shelf. They are pain to manage, ipssend tool is weak, serverdirector
>> complicated. And they are slow, the Fusion MPT SCSI with sw raid
>> significant faster, as we measured with bonnie++. Even the old aic7892 is
>> faster (these built-in scsi controllers on xseries motherboards).
>
>
> The 6i and 7 series of cards seem to have quite a bit better relative
> speeds. Certainly the 4Lx cards can be outperformed in simple "hdparm"
> tests by a 3ware SATA controller/disks of half the price..
>
> Plus, software RAID can't provide good performance on many server/DB
> applications without risking data loss in certain cases - for such
> things one really wants something with a battery-backed cache on it..
>
I just have a better feeling about hardware when there are dozens of
multi-TB servers from NY to CA. If it goes down IBM fixes it instead of
someone trying to get it back up at the console.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-18 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4UXuH-EU-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4VhD6-79H-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4VnSe-hv-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-08 19:09 ` Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid? Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <4XLQk-6Z2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4XMt3-7Yt-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-15 6:29 ` Robert Hancock
2005-10-18 22:35 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-10-08 19:16 Allen Martin
2005-10-08 19:16 ` Allen Martin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-07 10:11 Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-10-08 14:26 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-10-08 14:55 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 15:01 ` Lukasz Kosewski
2005-10-08 15:52 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-10 17:47 ` Ken Hwang
2005-10-08 15:23 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-10-08 16:03 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 16:08 ` John Stoffel
2005-10-08 16:39 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-15 4:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-10-15 5:06 ` Lajber Zoltan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435578C7.1090504@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.