All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	johnstul@us.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org,
	oleg@tv-sign.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:03:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43558D53.9070209@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43558AD8.3010307@am.sony.com>

Tim Bird wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
>>My claim is that if you _know_ that a timer will expire most likely, you 
>>want it to order at insertion time - i.e. you want to have a tree 
>>structure. If you _know_ that a timer will most likely _not_ expire, 
>>then you can avoid the tree overhead by 'delaying' the decision of 
>>sorting timers, to the point in the future where we really are forced to
>>do so.
>>
>>The result of this mathematical paradox is that we end up with two data 
>>structures: one is the timer wheel (kernel/timers.c) for 
>>timeout/exception related use; the other one is ktimers 
>>(kernel/ktimers.c), for expiry oriented use.
> 
> 
> I'd like to make an observation on another
> difference between the wheel and the rbtree.  Note that
> the wheel implementation inherently coalesces timeouts
> that are near each other, due to it's relatively
> low resolution (at tick granularity - which is
> still pretty low resolution on embedded hardware -
> usually 10 milliseconds.)
> 
> One concern I have with the rbtree is that this
> automatic coalescing is lost, and there may be
> unanticipated overhead in the move to support
> high resolution timers.

I think the coalescing is really done by the resolution rounding.  There will always be the list 
removal overhead, but short of a duplex tree (i.e. one entry per time with dup times linked from the 
first (Ug)) you will always have that.  What you want to coalesce is the interrupt overhead, not the 
list overhead, the former being MUCH larger.  The difference here is that we don't see the 
resolution reflected in the tree structure, but that, I think, is good.
> 
> Whether some form of coalescing should be
> preserved for timers, even when the system
> supports higher resolution, will be a
> function of the number of timers and their
> intended use.  I don't see any support for that
> in the current patch, but maybe I'm missing
> something.
> 
> =============================
~
-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers):  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-19  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-28 20:43 [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 tglx
2005-09-28 23:59 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29  0:50   ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29  0:56     ` john stultz
2005-09-29  1:05       ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29  1:10 ` john stultz
2005-09-29  6:53   ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-09-30 15:58     ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29 19:57 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-01  1:03 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-01 11:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-04  1:59     ` George Anzinger
2005-10-04  5:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-10 12:42     ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-10 14:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-01 12:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-10 17:22     ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-11  7:42       ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-12 22:36         ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-12 23:46           ` George Anzinger
2005-10-16 16:34             ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-16 19:26               ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-16 23:03                 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17  7:59                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17  8:26                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-17  9:29                     ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17  9:41                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17  9:56                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-17 11:00                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 16:25                           ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:49                             ` Tim Bird
2005-10-17 17:26                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-17 18:49                               ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 19:19                                 ` Tim Bird
2005-10-17 19:48                                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 20:13                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 20:31                                       ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-18  8:46                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-18 23:52                                           ` Tim Bird
2005-10-19  0:03                                             ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-10-19  1:58                                           ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-19  6:46                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 10:49                                             ` kernel/timer.c design (was: Re: ktimers subsystem) Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 17:48                                               ` kernel/timer.c design Tim Bird
2005-10-19 18:00                                               ` Tim Bird
2005-10-19 19:04                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-19 22:12                                               ` kernel/timer.c design (was: Re: ktimers subsystem) Roman Zippel
2005-10-19 11:40                                             ` [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 11:58                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 22:24                                               ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 20:09                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 20:55                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-18  0:07                               ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-18  1:03                                 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-19  1:26                                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-19  2:52                                     ` George Anzinger
2005-10-21 16:22                                       ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-23 18:17                                         ` George Anzinger
2005-10-27 20:23                                           ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-28  4:52                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-28 16:06                                               ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:33                         ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:39                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 16:54                             ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 17:35                               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17  9:54                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-04  1:55   ` George Anzinger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-17 18:38 linux
2005-10-17 19:04 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 22:41   ` linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43558D53.9070209@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.