From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: Re: network-bridge script reworked Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:03:31 -0500 Message-ID: <43566E53.7070508@spamcop.net> References: <20051019093502.GP8705@tpkurt.tagung.uni-hamburg.de> <43562AC6.3030006@spamcop.net> <20051019115944.GB11567@tpkurt.pmc.nue.novell.com> <43564BFF.5050900@spamcop.net> <20051019155846.GR26910@leeni.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20051019155846.GR26910@leeni.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ewan Mellor Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Kurt Garloff List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ewan Mellor wrote: > I've put in the network-bridge patch, along with Charles' changes to support > multiple bridges. I'm in no position to test a wide variety of > configurations, so I would appreciate some feedback from you guys. > > We currently have > > pdev="p${netdev}" > vdev="veth${vifnum}" Since the veth* device is tied to the vif0.* device, and not to the physical ethernet device in the machine, the way you merged it appears to me to be correct. I'll try it on my test machine, though, and validate that it Does The Right Thing.