From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:55:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [12.36.123.8] ([12.36.123.8]:44956 "EHLO
	voltage-out.atheros.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id S3465722AbVJVAza (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:55:30 +0100
Received: from atheros.com (mail.users.atheros.com [10.10.11.2])
	by voltage-out.atheros.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9M1kwX4002023
	for <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:46:58 -0700
Received: from [10.10.17.182] (account arai HELO [10.10.17.182])
  by atheros.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.4)
  with ESMTP id 29926976 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:55:28 -0700
Message-ID: <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:55:26 -0700
From:	Aaditya Rai <arai@atheros.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <arai@atheros.com>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 9336
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: arai@atheros.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

Hi everyone, I've searched the list for an answer and gotten, "there's 
no stable release; check out from cvs" ;-)
I'm trying to figure out if there are stability issues with mips port of 
2.6? Specifically for 24K? Is mips-2.4 generally considered to be more 
stable?

thanks!