From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:31:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Differentiating between http downloads and interactive Message-Id: <435B0427.20605@riverviewtech.net> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org I would recommend looking at the connrate (http://www.netfilter.org/project= s/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html#pom-extra-connrate) Patch-O-Matic patch. Yo= ur interactive sessions could be long lived and thus pass the connlimit and= / or connbytes matches and thus be falsely classified. Where as if you te= st for your interactive sessions by looking for an over all average low rat= e, burst delay burst delay etc, you should have a low average and thus be a= ble to match based on rate to classify them higher. Grant. . . . Paul J. Smith wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I=92ve been wondering if anyone has thought of a way to differentiate=20 > between an established http download and interactive http traffic? I=20 > would like to give interactive http traffic priority over someone=20 > downloading large files.=20 >=20 > Has anyone any ideas how to detect packets that are part of a download=20 > like this? >=20 > Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc