From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: Stabilisation of 1.3.2? Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:05:06 +0400 Message-ID: <435FB742.9020909@aknet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Hello. Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > I'd like to ask anybody competent, if 1.3.2 couldn't be stabilised. Of course it can be. 1.3.2 had some nasty things inside, but now most of its PRs were resolved, so I'd say it had quite stabilized. > It has been here for a while, poeople need it's features, and I simply > feel it's time to "move on" ;o) What do you mean by "move on"? If you have the particular list of the new features you'd like to see added - feel free to make that list available. If you just want to move on by following the project development - cvs is your friend, and you can follow the code progress very closely. The project *is* moving on, and it had advanced since 1.3.2 too. It just depends on the one's particular needs whether or not it moves on for him. It is even possible for everyone to influence the direction, so if you feel like it's time to move on - then go ahead! :)