From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9S3CWV07972 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:12:32 -0400 Received: from feel.to (sv.digitalhouse.co.jp [211.10.15.172]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9S3CTj2006897 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:12:29 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (172.pool5.dsltokyo.att.ne.jp [165.76.172.172]) by feel.to (8.11.6/3.7W/POP-auth(00031322)) with ESMTP id j9S3CS606964 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:12:28 +0900 Message-ID: <436197DA.800@snow.email.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:15:38 +0900 From: Mark Sargent MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Resizing LVM Revisited References: <43609147.7090205@snow.email.ne.jp> <71EF4685E87CEDB097D1851A@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> In-Reply-To: <71EF4685E87CEDB097D1851A@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Michael Loftis wrote: > For 2.4 kernels (2.4.20 and later) we've always used ReiserFS and had > extremely good results with online/hot expansion on top of LVMs. We > use ext3 for our static os/boot areas but all of our data areas, and > since we're using debian, that's just /var, and maybe /home, reside on > LVM + ReiserFS. > Hi All, whilst not a direct solution to my current situation I'll keep your ideas in mind for future deployment. Cheers. Mark Sargent.