From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Gardner Subject: Re: RE: Updated XenMon Patch Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:18:42 -0600 Message-ID: <43626B82.3020202@hp.com> References: <84011F8023C31D468BF00406886A430A08DB9D@PA-EXCH01.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84011F8023C31D468BF00406886A430A08DB9D@PA-EXCH01.vmware.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeffrey Buell Cc: Diwaker Gupta , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jeffrey Buell wrote: > Diwaker, > >I didn't mean to imply that XenMon is deficient in any way. Only that it is >a different kind of performance tool than, say, a function-level tool like >Xenoprof. XenMon works well for me now, the only suggestion I have is to >improve the formatting of the notlive output: some numbers are printed with >12 significant figures and the columns are not well-aligned. > > Jeff, The idea of the not-live output was that you'd read that stuff with a script and parse it, so little attention was given to making it look pretty. But I'll see what we can do to neaten it up a bit. Thanks again for using the tool and providing feedback! Rob