From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.marek@sh.cvut.cz (Rudolf Marek)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:18:38 +0000
Subject: [lm-sensors] Running lm-sensors on EPIA 5000 with Debian SARGE 2.6
Message-Id: <4368A08F.2090107@sh.cvut.cz>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20051012133202.9303523324@box1.planbit.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20051012133202.9303523324@box1.planbit.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Rudolf,
> 
> On 2005-11-01, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> 
>>VID "something special"
>>1 1 1 1  1.30V
>>1 1 1 0  1.35V
>>0 0 0 0  2.05V
> 
> 
> This looks like standard VRM 8.4 to me, nothing special.

OK, it seems it is not used. Newer datasheets are not talking about this.

> Sure, add new VRM-like values if needed. We might end up defining
> constant for these so that the number do not look like magic.

Yes it would be better.

> 
> While you're at it, I think we should do some changes to vid_from_reg: I
> think VRM 8.2 was the default for historical reasons, but it's not
> safe. We shouldn't have no default. 8.2 should be handled explicitely
> as other values are. Any non-zero, non-handled value should trigger a
> debug log message. Any non-handled value should result in 0 being
> returned. OK?

Sounds good.
Regards
Rudolf