From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:41770 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828AbdBWPBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:01:25 -0500 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andy Yan , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Shawn Lin , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4369285.zq7cJYMXhu@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <1486983566-32265-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <0bbc4151-d954-1a27-48c3-1e8c9cb9e16f@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Linus, Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017, 11:15:56 CET schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote: > > Hi Heiko & Rob: > > > > On 2017年02月13日 20:51, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > >> Hi Andy, > >> > >> Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: > >>> Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change > >>> RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. > >> > >> renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions > >> already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a > >> go-ahead > >> for it :-) . > >> > >> Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so > >> we're > >> not breaking any existing devices, right? > >> > > Yes, the 1108 Soc is completely new to market, this change will not > > > > breaking any existing devices. > > Nobody gets hurt. Just rename everything to avoid confusion. > Just my €0.01. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Tell me if I can merge a subset of the patches to the pinctrl tree. I did provide Reviewed-bys for them, so you should be able to merge the pinctrl patches (4+5) at your convenience :-) Thanks Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4369285.zq7cJYMXhu@phil> References: <1486983566-32265-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <0bbc4151-d954-1a27-48c3-1e8c9cb9e16f@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Shawn Lin , Stephen Boyd , "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Andy Yan , linux-clk , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org SGkgTGludXMsCgpBbSBEb25uZXJzdGFnLCAyMy4gRmVicnVhciAyMDE3LCAxMToxNTo1NiBDRVQg c2NocmllYiBMaW51cyBXYWxsZWlqOgo+IE9uIFR1ZSwgRmViIDE0LCAyMDE3IGF0IDE6NDQgQU0s IEFuZHkgWWFuIDxhbmR5LnlhbkByb2NrLWNoaXBzLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gPiBIaSBIZWlrbyAm IFJvYjoKPiA+IAo+ID4gT24gMjAxN+W5tDAy5pyIMTPml6UgMjA6NTEsIEhlaWtvIFN0dWVibmVy IHdyb3RlOgo+ID4+IEhpIEFuZHksCj4gPj4gCj4gPj4gQW0gTW9udGFnLCAxMy4gRmVicnVhciAy MDE3LCAxODo1OToyNiBDRVQgc2NocmllYiBBbmR5IFlhbjoKPiA+Pj4gUm9ja2NoaXAgZmluYWxs eSBuYW1lZCB0aGlzIHNvYyBhcyBSVjExMDgsIHNvIGNoYW5nZQo+ID4+PiBSSzExMDgvcmsxMTA4 IHRvIFJWMTEwOC9ydjExMDggZm9yIGNvbXBhdGlibGUuCj4gPj4gCj4gPj4gcmVuYW1pbmcgZXhp c3RpbmcgYmluZGluZ3MgKHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIGluIG11bHRpcGxlIGtlcm5lbCB2ZXJzaW9u cwo+ID4+IGFscmVhZHkpIGFsd2F5cyBpcyBhIGhvdCB0b3BpYy4gU28gSSdsbCBiZSBob3Bpbmcg Zm9yIFJvYiB0byBnaXZlIGEKPiA+PiBnby1haGVhZAo+ID4+IGZvciBpdCA6LSkgLgo+ID4+IAo+ ID4+IEp1c3QgdG8gY29uZmlybSwgdGhlIHJrMTEwOC9ydjExMDggaXMgY29tcGxldGVseSBuZXcg dG8gdGhlIG1hcmtldCwgc28KPiA+PiB3ZSdyZQo+ID4+IG5vdCBicmVha2luZyBhbnkgZXhpc3Rp bmcgZGV2aWNlcywgcmlnaHQ/Cj4gPj4gCj4gPiAgICAgWWVzLCB0aGUgMTEwOCBTb2MgaXMgY29t cGxldGVseSBuZXcgdG8gbWFya2V0LCB0aGlzIGNoYW5nZSB3aWxsIG5vdAo+ID4gCj4gPiBicmVh a2luZyBhbnkgZXhpc3RpbmcgZGV2aWNlcy4KPiAKPiBOb2JvZHkgZ2V0cyBodXJ0LiBKdXN0IHJl bmFtZSBldmVyeXRoaW5nIHRvIGF2b2lkIGNvbmZ1c2lvbi4KPiBKdXN0IG15IOKCrDAuMDEuCj4g Cj4gQWNrZWQtYnk6IExpbnVzIFdhbGxlaWogPGxpbnVzLndhbGxlaWpAbGluYXJvLm9yZz4KPiAK PiBUZWxsIG1lIGlmIEkgY2FuIG1lcmdlIGEgc3Vic2V0IG9mIHRoZSBwYXRjaGVzIHRvIHRoZSBw aW5jdHJsIHRyZWUuCgpJIGRpZCBwcm92aWRlIFJldmlld2VkLWJ5cyBmb3IgdGhlbSwgc28geW91 IHNob3VsZCBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIG1lcmdlIHRoZSAKcGluY3RybCBwYXRjaGVzICg0KzUpIGF0IHlv dXIgY29udmVuaWVuY2UgOi0pCgoKVGhhbmtzCkhlaWtvCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpMaW51eC1yb2NrY2hpcCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTGlu dXgtcm9ja2NoaXBAbGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9y Zy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2xpbnV4LXJvY2tjaGlwCg== From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:00:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 In-Reply-To: References: <1486983566-32265-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <0bbc4151-d954-1a27-48c3-1e8c9cb9e16f@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <4369285.zq7cJYMXhu@phil> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017, 11:15:56 CET schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote: > > Hi Heiko & Rob: > > > > On 2017?02?13? 20:51, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > >> Hi Andy, > >> > >> Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: > >>> Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change > >>> RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. > >> > >> renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions > >> already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a > >> go-ahead > >> for it :-) . > >> > >> Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so > >> we're > >> not breaking any existing devices, right? > >> > > Yes, the 1108 Soc is completely new to market, this change will not > > > > breaking any existing devices. > > Nobody gets hurt. Just rename everything to avoid confusion. > Just my ?0.01. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Tell me if I can merge a subset of the patches to the pinctrl tree. I did provide Reviewed-bys for them, so you should be able to merge the pinctrl patches (4+5) at your convenience :-) Thanks Heiko