From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz <jc@eclis.ch>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dean@arctic.org
Subject: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43695D94.10901@eclis.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130976935.27168.512.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
john stultz a écrit :
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 00:37 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>
>>john stultz a écrit :
>>
>>>On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 00:05 +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Since I have installed the new kernel 2.6.14, ntpd is unable to
>>>>synchronize the time:
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm working to see if I can reproduce this. Is this with 2.6.14 vanilla,
>>>or from Linus' git tree post 2.6.14?
>>
>>This is a vanilla 2.6.14 kernel from Linus git tree.
>>The architecture is i386:
>>Linux talla 2.6.14 #1 PREEMPT Tue Nov 1 17:27:04 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
>
>
> I can't seem to trivially reproduce this.
>
>
> Your ntpq associations output looks suspicious, though.
> ind assID status conf reach auth condition last_event cnt
> ===========================================================
> 1 14484 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
>
> That reject condition seems odd.
>
>
> What does running "ntpdate -uq <server>" produce?
First I have rebooted with a new kernel 2.6.14 that have the patch
pointed out by Dean Gaudet, this don't change the problem.
On the machine with 2.6.14:
talla:~# uname -a
Linux talla 2.6.14-1 #2 PREEMPT Thu Nov 3 00:54:44 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
talla:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset -14.893095, delay 0.02644
3 Nov 01:31:59 ntpdate[8186]: step time server 10.0.0.1 offset
-14.893095 sec
talla:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -14.907672, delay 0.04263
3 Nov 01:32:00 ntpdate[8187]: step time server 129.132.2.21 offset
-14.907672 sec
>
> Also, could you check 2.6.13, or even better do a binary search of
> mainline releases since 2.6.8 to narrow down where this broke for you?
On the others machines using the same server:
craie:~# uname -a
Linux craie 2.4.27-pre2-7-k7 #1 lun mai 17 00:08:15 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
craie:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset 0.000046, delay 0.02641
3 Nov 01:31:38 ntpdate[16783]: adjust time server 10.0.0.1 offset
0.000046 sec
craie:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -0.013689, delay 0.04294
3 Nov 01:31:39 ntpdate[16786]: adjust time server 129.132.2.21 offset
-0.013689 sec
citron:~# uname -a
Linux citron 2.6.12-nfs-1 #1 Fri Jun 24 18:23:39 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
citron:~# ntpdate -uq 10.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.1, stratum 3, offset 0.003676, delay 0.02647
3 Nov 01:32:06 ntpdate[13476]: adjust time server 10.0.0.1 offset
0.003676 sec
citron:~# ntpdate -uq 129.132.2.21
server 129.132.2.21, stratum 2, offset -0.010485, delay 0.04341
3 Nov 01:32:11 ntpdate[13477]: adjust time server 129.132.2.21 offset
-0.010485 sec
So this could to be something after the 2.6.12. All machines run the
same version of ntpd and use the same configuration file.
Thanks,
--
Jean-Christian de Rivaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-03 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-02 23:05 NTP broken with 2.6.14 Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-02 23:21 ` john stultz
2005-11-02 23:37 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 0:15 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 0:45 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz [this message]
2005-11-03 1:07 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 2:26 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 19:32 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 19:51 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 20:11 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 20:48 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:00 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 21:12 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-03 21:28 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:12 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 21:41 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 22:10 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 22:54 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 0:15 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 0:40 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 2:50 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-06 22:49 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2005-11-07 21:44 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 12:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-11-02 23:24 ` john stultz
2005-11-03 0:36 ` Roman Zippel
2005-11-03 1:13 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-03 9:42 ` Roman Zippel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-04 3:44 Brown, Len
2005-11-04 4:07 ` john stultz
2005-11-04 13:51 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-04 16:39 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
2005-11-04 17:41 ` Jean-Christian de Rivaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43695D94.10901@eclis.ch \
--to=jc@eclis.ch \
--cc=dean@arctic.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.