From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <ashley@pcraft.com>
To: Rob Sterenborg <rob@sterenborg.info>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Re: iptables problem
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:45:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4369B1F2.50804@pcraft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051103062533.C48C96AA57@smtp.sterenborg.info>
>Maybe you can let the kiosk hosts connect to the server and perform GET
>and PUT commands. The server then only has to put the needed updates in
>a specific directory where the kiosk hosts can download them from. This
>way the hosts themselves don't have to be reachable on the internet
>which would be better from a security point of view.
>
>
Thanks for the explanation Rob.
I can't control what happens on the serverside. That's a third
party company. I figured regardless of me being able to forward port 21
to one of these machines without a problem, I can't do it for all
three. So I think I'm screwed either way. Grrr...
--
H | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Imaging . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-03 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-01 18:06 iptables problem Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-02 0:31 ` Buddy wu
2005-11-02 1:29 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-02 1:37 ` Buddy wu
2005-11-02 5:56 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-02 7:20 ` Nikolai Georgiev
2005-11-02 8:01 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-02 22:49 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-03 6:19 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 6:45 ` Ashley M. Kirchner [this message]
2005-11-03 15:21 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) Jim Laurino
2005-11-03 16:02 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-03 16:23 ` Sven Schuster
2005-11-03 17:17 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusivesender " Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 17:00 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) sender " Jim Laurino
2005-11-03 19:57 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 5:00 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) " Jim Laurino
2005-11-04 5:06 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 6:04 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 21:54 ` Re: iptables problem R. DuFresne
2005-11-04 0:51 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 3:18 ` R. DuFresne
2005-11-04 4:26 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4369B1F2.50804@pcraft.com \
--to=ashley@pcraft.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rob@sterenborg.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.