From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] more ctnetlink updates Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:21:12 +0100 Message-ID: <436D76A8.30605@netfilter.org> References: <436BA1A6.4050705@netfilter.org> <20051105111828.GW5594@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <436C997D.6010205@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <436C997D.6010205@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > Harald Welte wrote: >>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:00:06PM +0100, Pablo Neira wrote: >>>Here follows more ctnetlink updates. There are no critical bug here so >>>these should go in 2.6.15, just some minor fixes and new features. >> >>applied 2-5 and 7 unmodified, backed out '6' and applied a modified >>version of '1' (see separate mails) > > What about my objections to 3 and 4? 3 at least should not go in. I don't agree. In the case of patch 3, it's true that sizechecks are missing in some parts of the code and I'm going to fix it, but that is a different patch that is not related itself with the marking support. -- The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris