From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <436F811C.1010306@tresys.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:30:20 -0500 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: Ivan Gyurdiev , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [ SEMANAGE ] Cleanup : move some things around References: <436DDB51.2080903@cornell.edu> <1131377599.20591.32.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <436F7F36.5080308@cornell.edu> <1131379914.20591.70.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1131379914.20591.70.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:22 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > >>>I'd prefer to hold cleanups until we have stabilized the functionality >>>and interfaces as desired for test1. I'm also not clear on why we want >>>a sepol handle in the ps case. >>> >> >>.. because we'll be using the sepol records either way, so we need the >>sepol handle.. >>Not using the sepol records requires copying them over into libsemanage. > > > Hmmm..well, let's take that up again later. Right now we need to deal > with finalizing the boolean support (e.g. having libsemanage use > security_set_boolean_list with permanent=0 to set the runtime boolean > values upon commit rather than loading the generated binary policy > file), and getting the migration steps in place for test1. > > I committed your semanage_set_reload_bools() patch and my > semanage_is_managed() patch to sourceforge cvs, but not the cleanup > patch. > Please see my other email about the semanage_set_reload_bools() patch, I believe it is flawed in a couple ways and should be reverted. Joshua -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.