From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <436F8383.9030909@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:40:35 -0500 From: Ivan Gyurdiev MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: Daniel J Walsh , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Joshua Brindle , Karl MacMillan , Frank Mayer , chris pebenito , James Morris , Chad Sellers Subject: Re: [ SELINUX ] [ POLICYCOREUTILS ] Convert setsebool -P to use libsemanage References: <436915FB.3040500@tresys.com> <1131027033.23420.30.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <436A86E6.4040205@cornell.edu> <436AF7BC.5000705@cornell.edu> <1131116390.23420.247.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <436B8185.4050508@cornell.edu> <1131118424.23420.265.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <436B8771.60203@redhat.com> <1131120757.23420.279.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1131121900.23420.288.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <436BD878.1070300@cornell.edu> <436BD9DB.2050700@cornell.edu> <1131371323.20591.16.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1131371323.20591.16.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov > No, the presence of libsemanage or even a particular version of > libsemanage doesn't tell us whether the system policy is managed via > libsemanage. It only tells us that some code on the system is linked > against libsemanage. Conversion of a system to being managed via > libsemanage is a change in the policy package, not a change in > libsemanage. In particular, it involves converting the policy package > to using policy modules and using semodule. > Does the existance of some random file in /etc/selinux/?/modules/active imply that libsemanage is managing the system. Shouldn't we be looking at /etc/selinux/config instead? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.