From: Jan Kiszka <kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] scheduling order of dying shadow threads
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:30:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4370D2B8.8070608@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4370C966.3030903@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
>>
>> I think this one is for you: ;)
>>
>> Sebastian got almost mad with his CAN driver while tracing a strange
>> scheduling behaviour during shadow thread deletion for several days(!) -
>> and I was right on the way to follow him yesterday evening. Attached is
>> a simplified demonstration of the effect, consisting of a RTDM driver
>> and both a kernel and user space application to trigger it.
>>
>
> I've spotted the issue in nucleus/shadow.c. Basically, the root thread
> priority boost was leaking to a non-shadow thread due to a missing
> priority reset in the lostage APC handler, whilst a shadow was in the
> process of relaxing. Really funky bug, thanks! :o> Fixed in the repo
> hopefully for good. The scheduling sequence is now correct with your
> demo app on my box.
>
Yep, looks good here as well. Great and quick work! Just don't expect
that someone can follow your explanations easily. :)
I think this issue has some similarity with the one I once stumbled over
regarding non-RT signalling to Linux. I'm not going to repeat my general
concerns regarding the priority boosting of the root thread now... ;)
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-08 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-08 8:38 [Xenomai-core] [BUG] scheduling order of dying shadow threads Jan Kiszka
2005-11-08 9:32 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-11-08 15:51 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-11-08 16:21 ` Sebastian Smolorz
2005-11-08 16:30 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2005-11-08 17:47 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-11-14 12:45 ` [Xenomai-core] [BUG] rt_pipe_flush declaration missing in skins/native/pipe.h Ignacio García Pérez
2005-11-14 15:02 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-11-14 16:08 ` Ignacio García Pérez
2005-11-14 16:20 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4370D2B8.8070608@domain.hid \
--to=kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.