From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Glait Subject: Re: Errors ... Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:45:42 -0300 Message-ID: <4370F256.6030503@renatre.org.ar> References: <4370AB14.9020203@renatre.org.ar> <1131460555.32482.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4370C459.5050600@renatre.org.ar> <1131465035.32482.37.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4370CB53.2000006@renatre.org.ar> <1131466365.32482.40.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZYSQ-0001jj-NM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:44:34 -0800 Received: from host132.200-45-109.telecom.net.ar ([200.45.109.132] helo=gate.renatre.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EZYSP-0008Qn-5A for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:44:34 -0800 Received: from mx2.renatre.org.ar (mx2.renatre.org.ar [192.168.1.4]) by gate.renatre.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA8IiELs028127 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:44:14 -0300 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.renatre.org.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9749E5C1E for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:55:38 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <1131466365.32482.40.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Now, everything is ok: in the client: load average: 0.06, 0.15, 0.18 and I can see the nfs`s filesystem. But in the server I steel getting: svc: unknown version (0) I will change the on-board ethernet card in this server. May be this the problem?? Trond Myklebust wrote: >On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 12:59 -0300, Alan Glait wrote: > > >>Ok ... when it happend i will test the comunication between the servers >>.... >> >> > >Thanks. > > > >>I will add to the kernel : >>Provide client support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension >>Provide server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension >> >> > >This isn't really necessary unless you want to use ACLs. The server >should be able to return the appropriate error to the client, and the >client will stop probing. > >Cheers, > Trond > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download >it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own >Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php >_______________________________________________ >NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs