From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965278AbVKIIDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:03:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965275AbVKIIDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:03:04 -0500 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:62658 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965276AbVKIIDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:03:03 -0500 Message-Id: <4371BB79.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:03:53 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Andrew Morton" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition References: <4370AE20.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <20051108145656.06e0d2b8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20051108145656.06e0d2b8.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Andrew Morton 08.11.05 23:56:56 >>> >"Jan Beulich" wrote: >> >> A trivial addition to the ELF definitions. >> >> ... >> #define STT_FILE 4 >> +#define STT_COMMON 5 >> +#define STT_TLS 6 > >Is there any particular reason for adding these, or is it just a >completeness thing? NLKD needs STT_COMMON. STT_TLS is just for completeness (and probably not of much use in the kernel, though Andi seemed to have at least considered using TLS for x86-64's per-CPU data).