From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: <akpm@osdl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: make trap information available to die handlers
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:20:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4371BF59.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511080912090.15288@shark.he.net>
>>> "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net> 08.11.05 18:13:28 >>>
>On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> >And the patch (attachment) also contains From:, but it's missing
>> >a Signed-off-by: line.
>>
>> I looked at many ChangeLog entries (which supposedly get created
from
>> the abstract), and by far not all of them have the author listed
both as
>> From: and Singed-Off-By:, which made me think that either of the
two
>> should be sufficient (and I really can't see why the author
information
>> needs to appear twice).
>
>Tools can determined the From: part from your email, so it's
>often safe to omit that part.
>
>The S-o-b part is required...
Strange. Andi Kleen specifically asked me to add From: to my patches...
And I still can't see why the author of a patch wouldn't implicitly sign
off on it.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-08 12:57 [PATCH] i386: export genapic again Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 13:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-08 13:22 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 13:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:52 ` [PATCH] i386: make trap information available to die handlers Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-08 17:08 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 17:13 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-09 8:20 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2005-11-10 12:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-08 20:58 ` Richard Knutsson
2005-11-08 16:52 ` [PATCH] i386: int3 adjustment Jan Beulich
2005-11-09 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] i386: double fault adjustment - introduce THREAD_ORDER Jan Beulich
2005-11-09 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: double fault adjustment Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:54 ` [PATCH] i386: NMI <-> debugging handler adjustments Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:55 ` [PATCH] i386: handle NMI case in IPI sending Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:55 ` [PATCH] i386: stand-alone CONFIG_PAE Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 17:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 17:10 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:57 ` [PATCH] i386: adjust page fault handling Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 21:22 ` [PATCH] i386: export genapic again Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-09 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4371BF59.76F0.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.