From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4376463C.7090908@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:45:00 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] printk References: <437464B2.6030204@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <437464B2.6030204@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ignacio_Garc=EDa_P=E9rez?= Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Ignacio Garc=EDa P=E9rez wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm porting an app from RTAI to Xenomai, and when it came to the > rt_printk function, I had to replace it with plain printk (the > xnarch_log* functions all use printk). >=20 > What I want to know if: >=20 > 1- Is totally safe to call the standard kernel printk function from a > real time task? >=20 Yes. > 2- Even if it's safe, can it affect the performance of a real time task= ? > (or can it block under *any* conceivable condition?) > No. > Thanks. >=20 > Nacho. >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help >=20 --=20 Philippe.