From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Artur_Mak=F3wka?= Subject: Re: More Slowdown Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:18:26 +0100 Message-ID: <437B77F2.5050401@ursynow.2a.pl> References: <1132093347.6347.7.camel@bauerbob.hirsch.lan> <437A674E.2060407@ursynow.2a.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <437A674E.2060407@ursynow.2a.pl> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Cc: Thorsten Hirsch Artur Mak=F3wka wrote: > My slowdown problems are on my web server, so its concerning different=20 > things than Evolution. but this slowdown was very easy to notice when=20 > writing something with vim. >=20 > Anyways, i remembered that i was using stable kernel without this=20 > happening some time ago. So i tested 2.6.14.x , 2.6.13.x mm and 2.6.13.x = > , and i still had system crashes. so i downgraded to 2.6.12.6 and the=20 > system is stable for more than 24 hours (first time in this month or=20 > even longer!) >=20 > probably some processes were doing fsync often (or something similar)=20 > and the effect was raising LA and lock-up at the end. >=20 > anyways, 2.6.12.6 (but other than .6 probably too) is, i think, bug=20 > free. maybe this will help. ok, now im 100% sure that 2.6.12.6 kernel + 2.6.12-3 reiser4 patch=20 doesnt have this fsync bug, or at least its not causing any big=20 slowdowns. The difference is really noticable. I don't know if i can do anything more to help you fix this bug. But do=20 you know is it going to be fixed soon ? Thanks in advance