From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <437D0ABB.3040004@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:56:59 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] kernel module misses rt_get_time References: <20051117214647.61520725.gda@domain.hid> <437D0735.8070306@domain.hid> <20051117235310.4418aee6.gda@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <20051117235310.4418aee6.gda@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0DD21604BFEE702BE2F73F40" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerald Dachs , xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0DD21604BFEE702BE2F73F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gerald Dachs wrote: >>Actually, rt_get_time and rt_get_time_ns are the same in the RTAI >>compatibility skin (counts are nanoseconds here, see count2nano e.g.). >>Therefore, a > > > Sorry, but I don't think so. In the rtai docs I read that rt_get_time returns ticks > and rt_get_time_ns returns nano seconds. > Yes, in the original RTAI. But the emulation skin of Xenomai makes no difference in this regard - all nanoseconds. That's why the conversion functions are void here. Jan --------------enig0DD21604BFEE702BE2F73F40 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDfQq7niDOoMHTA+kRAvvrAJ9mSY0maG8efczKLgmABP6ZfoXXUQCeKT45 xqW1Cwrsw6u0d7oMAkvFyGE= =jSpT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0DD21604BFEE702BE2F73F40--