All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Teach "approxidate" about weekday syntax
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:18:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <437D0FC8.6000906@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511171223110.13959@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This allows people to use syntax like "last thursday" for the approxidate. 
> 
> (Or, indeed, more complex "three thursdays ago", but I suspect that would 
> be pretty unusual).
> 
> NOTE! The parsing is strictly sequential, so if you do
> 
> 	"one day before last thursday"
> 
> it will _not_ do what you think it does. It will take the current time, 
> subtract one day, and then go back to the thursday before that. So to get 
> what you want, you'd have to write it the other way around:
> 
> 	"last thursday and one day before"
> 
> which is insane (it's usually the same as "last wednesday" _except_ if 
> today is Thursday, in which case "last wednesday" is yesterday, and "last 
> thursday and one day before" is eight days ago).
> 
> Similarly,
> 
> 	"last thursday one month ago"
> 
> will first go back to last thursday, and then go back one month from 
> there, not the other way around.
> 
> I doubt anybody would ever use insane dates like that, but I thought I'd 
> point out that the approxidate parsing is not exactly "standard English".
> 

I believe English would always parse from right to left, it might be the 
right thing to do...

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-17 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-17 20:36 Teach "approxidate" about weekday syntax Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 21:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-11-17 21:44   ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-17 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-17 23:18   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 23:23     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 12:12       ` David Roundy
2005-11-18 13:20         ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18 16:08           ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-18 17:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-19  0:00               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-19  0:07                 ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-19  0:28                   ` Randal L. Schwartz
2005-11-19  0:48                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 18:07             ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-11-20 23:36               ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18 18:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-11-18 16:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 17:26           ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-18 17:33             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 23:32     ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18  1:40       ` Martin Langhoff
2005-11-18  2:38         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18  2:53         ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-11-17 23:30   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=437D0FC8.6000906@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.