From: "E.Gryaznova" <grev@namesys.com>
To: "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de>
Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:06:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43820CAD.3090605@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511172040.39955.mail@earthworm.de>
Hello.
Hesse, Christian wrote:
>On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
>
>
>>Hello
>>
>>Hesse, Christian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies
>>>>fsync by avoid commiting of transactions which do not modify file being
>>>>fsync-ed.
>>>>
>>>>The patch applied to 2.6.14-mm2 with warnings, but that can be ignored.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hi everybody,
>>>
>>>I'm suffering the same problem, sync and fsync are horribly slow. I've
>>>written a small test program:
>>>
>>>http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c
>>>
>>>with 2.6.13:
>>>sync() = 0 <0.000198>
>>>fsync(3) = 0 <0.003353>
>>>
>>>with 2.6.14 (with and without patch):
>>>sync() = 0 <2.092873>
>>>fsync(3) = 0 <0.132579>
>>>
>>>
>>I tried your test on a box with reiser4 root fs:
>>2.6.13:
>>strace -T -e sync,fsync ./eworm xx
>>fsync(3) = 0 <0.158808>
>>
>>2.6.14-mm2 +
>>ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.14-mm2/reiser4-for-2.6.14-mm2
>>-1.patch.gz
>>
>>strace -T -e sync,fsync ./eworm xx
>>fsync(3) = 0 <0.005373>
>>
>>Would you please try whether 2.6.14-mm2 with fresh reiser4 update fsyncs
>>better?
>>
>>
>
>No change, still bad performance: up to 2 seconds in sync(), up to 0.2 seconds
>in fsync().
>
>
Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you
please provide more info?:
Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh
created reiser4 too?
Are these values stable reproducible? If you run this test several time
-- do you have the same results?
Would you please send df -T output and 2.6.14-mm2 config file?
Did you try this test on ext2? If no -- would you please try it on ext2
for the same kernels and send us the results?
Thanks,
Lena
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-21 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 13:47 More Slowdown Hesse, Christian
2005-11-17 17:22 ` More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2 Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-17 19:13 ` Thorsten Hirsch
2005-11-17 19:33 ` Thorsten Hirsch
2005-11-17 20:23 ` Thorsten Hirsch
2005-11-17 19:40 ` Hesse, Christian
2005-11-21 18:06 ` E.Gryaznova [this message]
2005-11-21 18:01 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-21 18:44 ` Hesse, Christian
2005-11-21 20:50 ` Hesse, Christian
2005-11-21 22:51 ` Craig Shelley
2005-11-21 19:41 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-21 21:01 ` Sander
2005-11-22 18:46 ` E.Gryaznova
2005-11-22 19:27 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-23 1:31 ` More Slowdown - testscript Craig Shelley
2005-11-23 1:47 ` More Slowdown - testscript [Part 2] Craig Shelley
2005-11-23 20:23 ` More Slowdown - testscript [noatime,nodiratime] Craig Shelley
2005-11-24 4:49 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-24 7:49 ` Sander
2005-11-24 9:41 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-24 10:13 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-23 7:09 ` Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2) Sander
2005-11-23 10:06 ` Collect data? E.Gryaznova
2005-11-23 10:15 ` Sander
2005-11-23 10:26 ` Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2) Hesse, Christian
2005-11-23 10:48 ` Sander
2005-11-23 11:22 ` Collect data? Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-23 11:53 ` Hesse, Christian
2005-11-23 12:17 ` Sander
2005-11-23 12:21 ` Hesse, Christian
2005-11-23 12:28 ` Sander
2005-11-23 13:09 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-23 15:10 ` Sander
2005-11-23 15:19 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-23 15:31 ` Sander
2005-11-23 15:50 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-23 15:57 ` Sander
2005-11-23 18:42 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-11-23 12:08 ` Sander
2005-11-22 10:23 ` More Slowdown Marcel Hilzinger
2005-11-22 10:38 ` Sander
2005-11-22 10:44 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-11-22 14:29 ` David Masover
2005-11-22 15:01 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-11-22 19:15 ` David Masover
2005-11-22 23:17 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-22 15:08 ` Sander
2005-11-22 11:34 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-11-22 12:29 ` Artur Makówka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43820CAD.3090605@namesys.com \
--to=grev@namesys.com \
--cc=mail@earthworm.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=vs@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.