From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "E.Gryaznova" Subject: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:46:23 +0300 Message-ID: <4383677F.8060106@namesys.com> References: <200511171447.41362.mail@earthworm.de> <437CBC63.3050202@namesys.com> <200511172040.39955.mail@earthworm.de> <43820CAD.3090605@namesys.com> <20051121210136.GA25708@favonius> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20051121210136.GA25708@favonius> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: sander@humilis.net Cc: "Hesse, Christian" , "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Sander wrote: >E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): > > >>Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you >>please provide more info?: >> >> > >FWIW, I notice the same (I'm not the OP). My main workstation (Athlon) >runs 2.6.15-rc1-mm1. Vim needs 4 to 12 seconds to close any file, mutt >is very slow on sending email, backups take several hours and in general >anything done on the filesystem seems slow. This system has one IDE >disk. > >Scrips are locked when vim closes and bash/perl complain when they try >to read/execute the script. > >The strange thing is that another system running 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 does not >have this slowdown. There are no Reiser4 updates in -mm2 AFAICS. This >system is a Via Epia with Reiser4 on lvm2 on 4xSATA. > > > >>Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh >>created reiser4 too? >> >> > >I'll try. > > > >>Are these values stable reproducible? If you run this test several >>time -- do you have the same results? >> >> > >Vim is always very slow on close (:wq) for me. > > > >>Would you please send df -T output >> >> > ># df -T / >Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >/dev/hda2 reiser4 232423180 166976448 65446732 72% / > > > >>and 2.6.14-mm2 config file? >> >> > >2.5.16-rc1-mm1 below. > > > >>Did you try this test on ext2? If no -- would you please try it on >>ext2 for the same kernels and send us the results? >> >> > >If I open and edit a file on /boot, which is ext2 on hda1, vim reacts as >expected. Quick and without a single delay. > ># echo "foo" > /boot/test ># time vim +"s/foo/bar/" +"wq" /boot/test >real 0m0.016s >user 0m0.000s >sys 0m0.000s > ># echo "foo" > /root/test ># time vim +"s/foo/bar/" +"wq" /root/test >real 0m9.667s >user 0m0.000s >sys 0m0.020s > >/dev/hda2 on / type reiser4 (rw) >/dev/hda1 on /boot type ext2 (rw) > > >Anything I can do to help? > > > Yes, thank you. Which iosched do you use? Would you please repeat the vim/reiser4 test for each iosched and send us the time values? Something like for i in cfq noop anticipatory deadline do echo $i > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && echo "foo" >/root/test && time vim +"s/ foo/bar/" +"wq" /root/test done Thanks, Lena ># ># IO Schedulers ># >CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y >CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y >CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y >CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y ># CONFIG_DEFAULT_AS is not set >CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEADLINE=y ># CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set ># CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP is not set >CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="deadline" > >