From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] nf_conntrack_netlink port take#2 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:21:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4383C406.7010400@eurodev.net> References: <43836FFE.3020504@eurodev.net> <20051122220851.GD31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Yasuyuki Kozakai Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20051122220851.GD31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira wrote: >> >>Sorry for the bad timing. Here attached the take#2 of the >>nf_conntrack_netlink port. It includes a layer-3 abstraction as >>suggested. Attached two patches: > > ok, I didn't have the time for a detailed review (and chances are > undlikely that I will have anytime soon). However, if noone opposes, I > would like to submit this for 2.6.16 quite soon. But not too soon (dave > has a open net-2.6.16 tree, but we don't want to flood him with > incremental fixes, at least not intentionally). So I'd say Pablo keeps > the patch update out-of-tree until 2.6.15 is released, and at that time > we push it to mainline immediately. Fine with it. I'll keep such patch updated at my people.netfilter.org place. -- Pablo