From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Subject: Re: Collect data? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:22:18 +0300 Message-ID: <438450EA.5050409@namesys.com> References: <200511171447.41362.mail@earthworm.de> <4383677F.8060106@namesys.com> <20051123070924.GA6951@favonius> <200511231126.43754.mail@earthworm.de> <20051123104847.GA22178@favonius> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20051123104847.GA22178@favonius> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: sander@humilis.net Cc: "Hesse, Christian" , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, "E.Gryaznova" Hello Sander wrote: > Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): >>On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote: >>>My 'good' system: >>>kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 >>>OS: Debian Sid >>>disks: 4x sata on Promise >>>raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe >>> >>>My 'bad' system: >>>kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm1 >>>OS: Debian Sid >>>disks: ata on nForce2 >>>raid/lvm/etc: none, single disk >>My 'bad' system: >>kernel: everything from 2.6.14-rc3* to 2.6.15-rc1* >>Compiler: GCC 3.4.4-r1 (including Gentoo patches) >>OS: Gentoo ~x86 >>disk: ATA on Intel ICH4-M (Centrino Notebook) >>raid/lvm/etc: none, single disk > > Your Compiler suggestion is a good one. > > I added your data at http://humilis.net/reiser4slowdown assuming you > don't mind (please let me know if you do mind). > > Reiser-dev team, do you need other info beside what is listed there? > It could be useful if there were a description of a test which was used to measure slowdown, result of that test on both "good" and "bad" kernels. Information about good kernel is also needed.