From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas@bppiac.hu>
Subject: Re: automount never umount
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:18:20 +0100
Message-ID: <43846C1C.3050305@bppiac.hu>
References: <4381E865.4070908@bppiac.hu>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0511220822410.16196@wombat.indigo.net.au>
	<4382E835.3020904@bppiac.hu>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0511222054060.2600@donald.themaw.net>
	<438344F7.8020503@bppiac.hu>
	<17283.19512.49399.338448@segfault.boston.redhat.com>
	<43838CA9.40105@bppiac.hu>
	<17283.46783.748916.772469@segfault.boston.redhat.com>
	<438435EF.6080102@bppiac.hu>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0511232105320.3200@donald.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511232105320.3200@donald.themaw.net>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://hera.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org

Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>output of dmesg or /var/log/daemon? there is nothing in dmesg.
>>i'm running this kernel currently and mount nfs and smbfs servers.
>>---------------------------
>>root      1974  0.0  0.0   1788   736 ?        Ss   10:05   0:00
>>/usr/sbin/automount --timeout=60 --debug /smb program /etc/auto.smb
>>root      1976  0.0  0.0   1788   736 ?        Ss   10:05   0:00
>>/usr/sbin/automount --timeout=60 --debug /net program /etc/auto.net
>>---------------------------
>>how long should i wait? as the timeout is 1 minute, they should have to
>>be umounted, but not. here is the relevant part of daemon log which
>>don't tell me too much:-(
> 
> 
> You've waited long enough. Your timeout was 60 seconds.
> 
> This is really strange. We didn't catch any activity from the patch so I 
> don't know why it isn't expiring. Come to think of it we we should have 
> at least got some kernel messages?
> 
> What version was the kernel you originally saw this on?

# rpm -q kernel
kernel-2.6.14-1.1637_FC4
kernel-2.6.14-1.1641_FC4.jmoyertest.1


> Jeff, I'm wondering if this is a regression from the latest patch.
> Was that in the above kernel?
> 
> Farkas, if your willing the next step in this process is likely to 
> generate even more output but hopefully will give us more info.

what should i do?


-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"