From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:13:18 +0000 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [LARTC] has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches Message-Id: <4385D88E.6080307@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <43846D68.2050709@yahoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <43846D68.2050709@yahoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Sophana Kok wrote: > Markus Schulz wrote: > >> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote: >> >> >>> I use something similar and use ceil 286kbit while synced at 288kbit >>> without problems. >>> > > What thing similar do you use? I don't understand why it is not in the > kernel already. I use my own based on the tc tweak that Ed Wildgoose posted to the list, but patching htb aswell so it's perfect (the tc alone patch is a cell too big for some packet sizes) > >> should be easy to patch in. Overhead is only a simple variable which >> will be added in htb/* module for each paket. Only sign/unsign >> problem should be considered. >> >> > How? > > The ppp over aal5 atm encapsulation is in almost all adsl lines isn't it? > Isn't it standard? In jeesper's thesis there is a table - Knowing you overhead can be tricky - but you can test, best if your modem gives cell counters or even if it doesn't on adsl you may be able to see differences in throughput/latency if you look hard enough. > This makes a huge number of lines in the world. > Are there other patches ? > or distributions that already include these patches? I don't think so, patching is easy you need to test and know your overheads aswell. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc