From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Farkas Levente Subject: Re: automount never umount Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:17:36 +0100 Message-ID: <43864A10.4090801@bppiac.hu> References: <4381E865.4070908@bppiac.hu> <4382E835.3020904@bppiac.hu> <438344F7.8020503@bppiac.hu> <17283.19512.49399.338448@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <43838CA9.40105@bppiac.hu> <17283.46783.748916.772469@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <438435EF.6080102@bppiac.hu> <43846C1C.3050305@bppiac.hu> <17284.35467.301318.255602@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <17284.40834.559604.943290@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <4384A354.9040502@bppiac.hu> <17284.41971.660257.356263@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <43859055.3020508@bppiac.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org Ian Kent wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Farkas Levente wrote: > > >>Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >>>lfarkas> a full lsof ? fuser -v for what? >>> >>>For the mount points in question. I guess something like: >>> >>>fuser -v -m >>> >>>lsof +D >> >>ok now i use only nfs and no smbfs, uprgade to >>kernel-2.6.14-1.1641_FC4.jmoyertest.2 but it doesn't show me any >>difference. so here is the current daemon log and that's all:-( >>------------------------------- >>[root@garfield ~]# fuser -v -m /net/ >> >> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND >>/net/ root 1919 f.... automount >>[root@garfield ~]# lsof +D /net/ >>COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME >>automount 1919 root 5r DIR 0,20 0 5471 /net/ >>------------------------------- >>new tips? > > > These's still no printk output? > > So no explanation of what is wrong. > > Jeff we could enable DEBUG in the kernel module. > What do you think. > > If it would be better I could take the source from the kernel you have and > put together a tarball. Farkas could then compile and install it so that > the original module can restored with a "make uninstall" when we are done. i try what you want, althugh i prefer rpms. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"