From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Ayres Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0 Test CD v1 released Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:33:48 -0500 Message-ID: <43874AFC.7030604@tektonic.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian, Can you comment if the bugs I've reported in bugzilla #'s 402, 405, and 406 have been fixed/assigned? I tried to change a few of our (unixshell.com) users over to a 3.0 server and it turned out poorly. We have serial console (with logging) setup for our servers so when a system panics or sends an oops so I am more than capable of capturing it submitting bugs for any troubles, but I received those different 3 panics and the system couldn't stay up for more than a few hours (I had even tried turning off PAE and SMP support). This was all using snapshots from around 11/13. I know there have been many, many commits since then. Thanks, Matt Ian Pratt wrote: > Folks, > > As you're probably aware we've been running a number of different > initiatives to test the xen -unstable tree prior to release as 3.0.0: We > have the XenRT automated regression test suite which gives Xen a > thorough workout on a range of different machines every night. Among > other tests, XenRT incorporates the excellent xm-test suite to stress > xend. We're also running various ISV application validation suites over > Xen. There's also all the testing that's going on in the community, and > the daily reports from IBM and Intel. All indications are that we're > getting very close to release quality. >