From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] raw table and NOTRACK support Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:49:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4389FFB6.8000705@trash.net> References: <4381A0C3.7020406@tac.ch> <438327D2.5090506@tac.ch> <43833BE3.8060909@tac.ch> <43833F1D.3060309@tac.ch> <438468E8.4090309@tac.ch> <4389D26A.8070904@trash.net> <4389F974.5060405@drugphish.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Willy Tarreau , Netfilter Developers , Roberto Nibali Return-path: To: Roberto Nibali In-Reply-To: <4389F974.5060405@drugphish.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Roberto Nibali wrote: >>>Is there a reason not to include this patch in 2.4.x? >> >>Yes, it turned out to break a lots of things on loopback. > > > Although I don't see how in 2.4.x, I now vaguely remember the bug report. One of the things it broke was SO_ORIGINAL_DST support for transparent proxying, which also affects 2.4. >>We put a different patch in 2.6, which dropped the reference >>at known points where the packet would be queued, except >>for the qdiscs. We can put the same patch in 2.4. > > > That would be perfect, could you point me to the git reference to this > patch, please? It was commit 84531c24f27b02daa8e54e2bb6dc74a730fdf0a5, titled "[NETFILTER]: Revert nf_reset change".